In a landmark 1989 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that burning the American flag in protest is protected speech under the First Amendment. Now, the Trump administration aims to test that.

Political discussions between employees at work become heated, negative social media political posts go viral, off-duty employees are photographed participating in off-duty protests, or workers show ...

As protests intensify in Idaho and across the country, it’s crucial to know what types of expressions are protected under the First Amendment. Provocative signs, physical gestures and chants are ...

In the wake of conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s murder, a fierce First Amendment debate over the concept of “hate speech” has taken center stage across the nation. Conservative lawmakers and ...

Last week, I explained why many generative AI outputs constitute speech that warrants First Amendment protection. This post explores the ramifications of that conclusion. Importantly, this protection ...

Criticism of Israel — like criticism of any government — is protected speech. But antisemitic intimidation is not. New Jersey’s proposed antisemitism bill, A3558, draws that line. Recent commentary ...