Like all good lawyers, Supreme Court justices can argue over anything – including, it turns out, how best to argue.
The Ohio Supreme Court began oral arguments in a second case over pandemic unemployment benefits by wondering why the case was back before the justices. “I went back to Bowling 1, we dismissed it as ...
Empirical SCOTUS is a recurring series by Adam Feldman that looks at Supreme Court data, primarily in the form of opinions ...
Oral argument sessions at the Supreme Court are getting longer, and it’s prompting a debate about whether something needs to ...
Steven Saal examines the U.S. Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, where the justices grapple with whether federal law shields freight brokers from state negligence ...
The Supreme Court’s term is winding down after months of oral arguments in hotly contested cases, during a year when ...
The Indiana Supreme Court heard arguments in an appeal about NIPSCO rate increases, with an intervenor arguing that the ...
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Trump v. Barbara, a case challenging the Trump Administration’s executive order seeking to narrow birthright citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment. The ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results